A Southern California earthquake forecast based
on computer models has successfully pinpointed
the location of nearly every major temblor to
hit the region over the last four years.
Using historical seismic records as a base, the
Rundle-Tiampo earthquake forecast has accurately
predicted locations for 15 of the last 16
temblors with magnitudes greater than 5.0 on the
Richter scale, all of which have occurred since
January 2000. The forecast is currently about
halfway through its 10-year timespan.
�I have to say that it�s gratifying, though I�m
not surprised,� said Kristy Tiampo, an assistant
professor with the University of Western Ontario
in Canada, during a telephone interview. �The
Southern California and Northern California
seismic networks have quite good databases, the
best freely available data around.�
Tiampo worked with colleague John Rundle,
director of Computational Science and
Engineering initiative for the University of
California, Davis to develop the quake forecast
model. The forecast is one part of NASA�s
QuakeSim project aimed at developing new methods
and tools for accurate earthquake predictions.
�What we�re going for with [Rundle�s] data is to
make earthquake forecasting like doing weather
maps,� said Andrea Donnellan, QuakeSim principal
investigator at NASA�s Jet Propulsion Laboratory
(JPL) in Pasadena, California. �So that every
year or month, you can update the map.�
In addition to the Rundle-Tiampo forecast, the
QuakeSim project relies on archived seismic
data, extremely accurate global positioning
measurements taken by space-bound satellites, as
well as detailed
interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR)
measurements to track surface changes.
�It�s mostly a mystery,� Donnellan told
SPACE.com of the Earth�s seismic activity.
�One of the things we�re learning is that you
can�t study one fault�each earthquake at one
fault affects others.�
Building a temblor forecast
With funding from NASA and the U.S. Department
of Energy, Rundle and Tiampo pored through
Southern California seismic records from 1932
onward, inserting the data into a computer model
designed to seek out tremor hotspots within the
state.
�The computer model simulates the Southern
California [seismic] network,� Tiampo said,
adding that in addition to using earthquake
data, the forecast also incorporated modeling
techniques typically used for neural net and
turbulence simulations.
The Rundle-Tiampo forecast split the southern
half of California � from San Francisco down to
the Mexican border � into about 4,000 individual
boxes and calculated the seismic potential for a
strong earthquake in each space between 2000 and
2009. Released in 2002, the forecast has
apparently pinned the location of 11
earthquakes, while four others occurred within
the two previous years.
The outstanding earthquake, a 5.2magnitude
temblor that shook a region covered by the
Pacific Ocean near San Clemente Island, occurred
on June 15, 2004. Rundle has said the forecast
may have missed the shaker because it was
centered on a region near the edge of the
state�s seismic network. That may have added an
increased uncertainty to its location, he added.
�What I think these hotspots should really be
used for is education�to make sure that gas
lines are up to code in these regions and
acquire the resources to prepare buildings for
quakes,� Tiampo said, adding that there are
still just over five years left to measure the
forecast�s effectiveness. �And I would also like
to see the model revised in upcoming years.�
Estimating the magnitudes - in addition to the
location - of potential tremors and narrowing
the forecast timeline are prime targets for
improvements, researchers said.
"You would want to be able to give a
probability, such as between the next six months
and two years, for a possible earthquake,"
Tiampo added. "And then keep a running forecast
going as the system changes."
Spotting Earth strain from the orbit
Both Tiampo and Donnellan agree that while the
Rundle-Tiampo forecast appears to be on the
right track, it is restricted solely to
seismometer records. The model does not include
data on the slow deformation to the Earth�s
surface that can occur without registering on
the Richter scale.
�Seismometers only measure the shaking action,�
Donnellan said, adding that earthquake
researchers have observed high strain within the
hotspots targeted by the Rundle-Tiampo forecast.
That strain can slowly shift the Earth�s crust.
For example, after the 1994 Northridge
earthquake, which registered 6.7 in magnitude,
the surrounding mountains continued to move,
growing a full 12 inches (30 centimeters)
taller, Donnellan said.
Donnellan said QuakeSim researchers have
demonstrated that InSAR measurements could
detect high strain events from space, but only
by borrowing time with spacecraft that were not
designed specifically for the task.
A dedicated space instrument would not only add
to the baseline of earthquake data, but also
reach temblor prone regions like Turkey where
large-scale seismic measurements are
unavailable, or Japan, where seismic network
changes has made consistent long-term
measurements difficult to obtain, she added.
During an October 2004 workshop in Oxnard,
California, researchers gathered together to
determine the requirements necessary for a
dedicated InSAR space mission.
�With a five-year mission, you could pretty much
map the surface strain on the entire globe,�
Donnellan said, adding that such an instrument
could also serve as a worldwide earthquake
watchdog. �Anything above a 5.0 you should be
able to detect, which could be about 200
earthquakes a year.�